Thursday, June 26, 2008

Vacation

I won't deny that I was a bit depressed as I boarded my return flight back to Texas 2 days ago. If it weren't for the flight capacity, and mostly the toothache that I had, I would most likely still be hanging out in Reno. I could have stayed either there or in Medford for another 2 weeks and been just fine. Looking back though, I suppose it was best that I returned home when I did. (I'm scheduled for a root canal next Tuesday after the infection goes down...oh fun.)

Obviously, I enjoyed our family vacation. We had plenty of activities to keep us busy and most definitely plenty of beauty for our eyes to adore. Some of the highlights of our trip included boating on Fish Lake (where we caught zero fish regardless of them jumping not 20 feet around the perimiter of our boat). We also spent an afternoon cruising up and down the Rogue River on the Hellgate Jetboat Excursion and Kenny and I were even able to sneak away for a date night that included watching "The Comedy Of Errors" at the Oregon Shakespear Festival.

I could blog for hours describing the sights, scents and sounds that put me on cloud nine while in Oregon and Nevada. Perhaps I will do that in the upcoming days. For now, I'll just post a few pictures.


Saturday, June 07, 2008

Sadie Part II

Several hospital and vet office trips later, we were able to bring Sadie home with us last night. She is still not out of the woods. At this point, she still has a 50-50 chance of survival. Her body's ability to produce more platelets will likely make or break her. So far, her platelet count is decreasing. We are obviously hoping to turn a corner very soon. But for now, she is home. And we count that small miracle as a blessing beyond measure.

Below is an interesting article that I found at the vet's office.

______________________________________________

Love is Never Having to Say Anything at All
Patricia B. McConnell

Cool Hand Luke is not going to die. I won't stand for it. I know, of course, that he will, at least part of me does.

After all, he's 11, he's a dog, and he's already cheated death from cancer, cars, and a 300-pound ram determined to kill him or me, whoever came first. I'm more grateful than I can say that Luke is still here. His front paws may be swollen with arthritis and he may tire easily, but he still loves working sheep, fetching tennis balls, and sitting in silence with me in the rosy light of the sunset. And I still love him so completely that I imagine his death to be as if all the oxygen in the air disappeared, and I was left to try to survive without it.

I'm not alone in this love affair. Everywhere I go I talk to people who have soul mates like Luke, dogs so special we get tears in our eyes just talking about them. This phenomenon is not new--people have been in love with dogs for centuries. Nor is the love of pets unique to industrial societies--even hunter/gatherer societies have animal companions.

While not everyone loves dogs, there's a phenomenon that needs explaining: Those of us who love dogs love them so deeply it hurts. It's easy to demean these feelings, as people often do. Dog lovers have been described as neurotics or social incompetents, and though dog lovers can be just as emotionally illiterate as the rest of the world, loving dogs is not, in itself, the problem. There's something much bigger than neediness that drives our love of dogs. People the world over have sought an answer to why we love dogs, perhaps an indication that the question is deeply rooted. I don't think it's a trivial question, either, and not just because I'm stupid in love with my dogs. I'm also a scientist and applied animal behaviorist, and from the perspective of biology, the question is both interesting and important.

Indeed, biology itself provides some of the answers. One obvious connection between dogs and humans is our shared natural history. Dogs and people may be strikingly different in many ways, but, if you compare our behavior with that of other animals, we share more than we don't. Like dogs, people sleep, eat, and hunt together, and that in itself is notable in the animal kingdom. Pandas are notoriously solitary. Feral cats can live in groups or alone, but they don't hunt together. Butterflies are often seen together, but only because they're attracted to the same minerals in the puddle in your driveway. In contrast to animals who are seen together without social relationships, dogs and humans ore so social that we even raise our young together, sometimes deferring our own reproduction in order to assist another member of the group. Individuals of both species will nurse the young of another female, and that fact alone puts dogs and humans in a special category.

Many other factors of natural history have a profound effect on our relationship with dogs. Dogs, like people, live in social hierarchies, and are generally amenable to doing what high-status individuals ask of them. Both human beings and dogs are "Peter Pan animals," whose behavior is shaped by a process called paedomorphism, in which adult, sexually mature individuals retain the characteristics of adolescents, remaining curious and playful all their lives. It's easy to take playing with your dog for granted, but go ask a cow to play with you and see how far you get.

Equally important is our shared tendency to nurture needy individuals. In both species, offspring are born helpless, desperately in need of care and a safe environment in which to learn survival skills. Humans have such an extended period of parental care that we're hard-wired to go week-kneed at animals who look infantile. If you want people to feel all warm and gooey and nurturing, show them a baby mammal with a disproportionately large forehead and over sized hands, and listen for the "Awww's" coming out of the crowd. This reaction to young, needy mammals is such a primal part of who we are that psychologists have labeled it the "Aw phenomenon."

Dogs don't stay cute little puppies for long, but they remain dependent and nonverbal, much like very young children. Some of us may have great respect for our dogs, as I do for Luke, but, although he can load the ram on the truck single-handedly, he still can't open doors or pull his dinner out from that magic place under the counter. Natural selection has emphasized nurturance in our species, and surly dogs have profited from it.

All these shared characteristics are important, but somehow all of them don't seem enough to explain the passion many of us have for our dogs. A love of play and strategic hunting techniques may drive our relationship, but a shared natural history isn't enough of an explanation when some big, strong fireman is sobbing in my office while discussing euthanizing his dog. The depth of pain we dog lovers feel when facing the loss of one of our best friends can be overwhelming.

In some ways it's similar to the grief we feel when we lose a human loved one. But something not particularly obvious is different about our grief over losing a dog. People who've never cried in their lives cry over losing their dogs. I'll never forget the episode of the TV series M*A*S*H* when, surrounded by the relentless agonies of injured and dying soldiers in Korea, the medical team coped with black humor, bravery, and stamina--until a little stray dog they'd ado[ted died. Then they fell apart. It may have been just a television show, but it reflected something universally true about the effect dogs have on us.

I remember watching the movie My Dog Skip with a friend and crying at the end with the same pure emotion I say on that M*A*S*H* episode. We weren't simply crying about the loss of a dog, we were crying over loss itself, and when personified in a dog, that sense of loss was easier to let out. The tendency of humans to be able to grieve so deeply over a dog indicates that something big and primal and important goes on between people and dogs that has as much to do with our emotions as our shared natural history.

So why is it, then, that dogs can elicit the purity of emotion we often cover up in our human relationships? Perhaps, just perhaps, it is because dogs don't talk. Sure, you already knew that. But the more I think about the consequences of our nonverbal relationship with dogs, the more benefits there are. Psychologists have told us for years that dogs give us "non judgemental positive regard," and we intuitively understand exactly what that means. The pure and simple you that radiates from our dogs every time we come home is rarely duplicated in human greetings, and it can elicit the feeling of pure love that we all seek from infancy onward.. Dogs indeed love us with tremendous intensity, and the fact that they can't talk acts to underscore it, not diminish it.

Of course we can communicate with dogs. They understand hundreds of words we use and get a tremendous amount of information from our intonation. But even the most avid dog lover can't sit down and have an in-depth conversation with their dog.

If dogs could talk, I suspect things wouldn't feel so pure and simple. Though most of our dogs love us deeply, they don't necessarily love us every second of the day. Luke can shoot me a look that can be summed up in two words. The second is "you," but the first is not "love." Why should intelligent individuals not make judgments about what happens to them? Surely our dogs can get frustrated if we delay that walk in the woods for the phone call that came just as we were going out the door, just like our spouses or partners can. I don't say this cynically, and I don't want to burst any sacred bubbles, but perhaps what dogs give us is the perception of continual "nonjudgmental positive regard." If I could teach Luke to talk, I'm not sure I'd always be happy about what he had to say.

A hurtful word can live a long time in the heart of the receiver, and influence the relationship forever after. In the case of dogs, perhaps it's easier to ignore an irritation here and a ruffled feather there, because our dogs can't put words to them.. "Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me" may be common refrain, but it's not based in reality. Words can cause terrible damage, sometimes lasting a lifetime, and the fact that dogs can't use them may be a blessings.

Our lack of a shared language can be a great disadvantage, causing us grief when we're desperate to ask our dogs what's wrong, or yearning to explain why we're torturing them with another radiation treatment. Our ability to talk to one another may be one of the greatest accomplishments of the human species, and there are times when I'd give anything to be able to communicate with Luke in greater depth than I can now. But speech comes with a price. Being in conversation with even a good friend raises your blood pressure. It takes a lot of mental energy to make decisions about what words to say, how to string them together, what tone to use when you say them. That's the very same energy that spiritual leaders advise us to turn off as a way of revitalizing ourselves. The constant conversation that most of us have in our heads can be exhausting and is so inherent to the way our brains work that we actually have to practice turning it off. Anyone who's tried meditation knows how difficult it can be to shut off the internal chatter that comes with being verbal.

Experts at meditation can be "in the present," and free of mental noise for hours, but I'm thrilled to turn off my brain for a minute or two. That's because I'm a novice at a skill we humans need to learn and practice. But I doubt Luke has to practice meditating to be able to experience the kind of spiritual peace humans have to learn to find. Being nonverbal allows an otherwise intelligent, highly connected animal to live in the present without the hailstorm of internal conversations that complicate our human lives. If you think about it, most of what we "talk" about in our won heads isn't about the present, it's about the past or future. But dogs keep us firmly rooted in the here and now, and that, it turns out, is a notable accomplishment.

Where but with dogs can we have such a deep and meaningful relationship with so little baggage? Words may be wonderful things, but they carry weight with them, and there's a great lightness of being when they are discarded. The story of the Garden of Eden is a lovely allegory about the cost of cognition. Being able to use our brains the way we do separates us from the rest of the animal world, and, like most everything else in life, it has its costs as well as its benefits.

Perhaps it's not just the things we share with dogs that wrap us together in mutual love. In the lovely, balanced irony of yin and yang, it's the differences as much as the similarities that bring us together. Some of the happiest times are when Luke and I sit silently together, overlooking the green, rolling hills of southern Wisconsin. Our lack of language doesn't get in the way, but it creates an opening for something else, something deep and pure and good. We dog lovers share a Zen-like communion with our dogs, uncluttered by nouns and adverbs and dangling participles. This connection speaks to a part of us that needs to be nurtured and listened to, but is so often drowned out in the cacophony of speech. Dogs remind us that we are being heard, without the additional weight of words. What a gift. No wonder we love them so much.

Thursday, June 05, 2008

Sadie

I know better than that. Dogs don't handle heat the way that humans do. I know better. Yet I still had the brilliant idea to go for a walk in the mid-day sun with the family, dog included. And even though the temperature outside was in the mid 90's, I thought the breeze was enough to warrant a nice walk for everyone. Jason and Dallas would ride their bikes, I would push Keegan on his tricycle and Kenny would walk our family dog, Sadie.

Kenny immediately let Sadie off her leash allowing her to run free. She resembles an overstuffed sausage at this stage in her life. Exercise is hardly in her daily routine. So a free run would be good for her. And she seemed overjoyed to be out and running along side Jason and Dallas as they pedeled through the neighborhood streets.

At about 3/4 of the way into our walk, we realized that we should have brought her a bowl for some water. Instead, we led her to a garden hose and turned it on where she drank what she could between her heavy pants. She layed down on a cool spot of grass as if to tell us that she had gone as far as she intended to go. I told Kenny that I would run her back to the house and get her inside where it was cool and where she could get some fresh water, which is exactly what I did. But instead of drinking the water, she wandered around our house seeking an area that would cool her off quickly. She wouldn't take any water.

I immediately Google'd signs of heat stroke in canines. The symptoms were, rectal temperature of 106 or more, staggering, vomitting and diareah. At this point, Kenny was back at home and watching Sadie alongside me. We both jokingly shrugged at the idea of checking her rectal temperature, but agreed that she needed to be cooled down. He decided to lead her outside so that he could drench her with the water hose. As they headed downstairs, I noticed her staggering...sign #1. As she exited to the front porch, she immediately vomitted...sign #2. At that point, Kenny grabbed her and rushed her to the vet's office just down the road.

It didn't take much to confirm that she was indeed suffering from a heat stroke. Her temperature was 109...the highest that they had seen. She was immediately pumped full of fluids and every attempt to bring her temperature down was made. As Kenny headed off to work, I headed down to the vet's office to stay on site. Thirty minutes later, I was led back to see her.

She looked horrible. Her eyes were sunken and droopy. She barely made an attempt to raise her head to greet me. As they opened the kennel door, I stooped down to sit with her and found myself climbing into the kennel to sit beside and pet her. I supported the weight of her head by holding her chin so that we could have eye contact. All the while, the only thought running through my mind was "I did this to her. This was my stupid idea. I did this to her."

The vet came in and confirmed my fears. She was at a very critical stage and they didn't know if she would be able to pull through. She was facing an inability to clot, which if not conquered, would cause her to bleed out. In addition, she may have permanent organ failure.

They suggested taking her to the Animal Emergency Center down the road for overnight treatment. So after getting her stabilized, off we headed. When we arrived, the vet ran a couple of blood panels and confirmed that she was not clotting and would need plasma transfusions. When they brought in the cost estimates ($1,400-$2,500)along with the news that she had a 50-50 chance of survival, I immediately called Kenny and began sobbing. I asked him what he wanted to do and then asked what he thought we should do. Obviously, he wanted to do anything to save our dog's life. And 2 seconds before he began to tell me what he thought we should do, I stopped him from uttering the words. I told him that I couldn't live with the guilt of knowing that this was my fault. I told him that if she pulls through, she's got several years of joy that she can bring. And for those reasons, I wanted to take our chances...no matter the cost. So, I signed the release and gave her over to the care of the staff. They told me that no-news was good news and that if she could make it through the night, it would be a huge accomplishment.

The first words our of Jason's mouth as I walked through our home's front door were, "Where's Sadie?!?" He began crying immediately, fearing the worst. I tried to comfort him and assure him that they were doing absolutely everything possible to save her. Needless to say, it was a rough night last night for everyone.

At 11:30pm, the phone rang. I immediately flashed back to "No news is good news." As I grabbed the phone and saw the caller ID "Animal Emergency Center", my legs and arms went numb and my heart sank into the pit of my stomach. It seemed like a slow-motion movie as the voice on the other end began to tell me "No no...it's good news! Sadie is responding to the plasma. She is clotting and showing signs of improvement. I just thought you'd want to know." Whew!!

This morning, Jason and I hopped in the truck and headed down the pick her up. We were simply transporting her back to our vets office for further fluids and observation today.

Just now, the vet called to say that indeed, she has improved. Yet he is still concerned about possible kidney damage. She is still extremely dehydrated. At this point they are trying to flush out all the toxins from her body...those that are attempting to damager her kidneys. More blood panels are scheduled for this afternoon. But hopefully, she will be able to come home tonight. We are all obviously keeping our fingers crossed.

I never thought I'd be one of those animal nuts that spends thousands of dollars on their pet. But here I am....one of those nuts. Perhaps my guilt is the reason why $2,000-and-counting later, she is still alive with a fighting chance. I would like to believe though, that we said, "do whatever it takes." because she is such a huge part of our family. She is an amazing dog. Gentle, obedient, smart, loyal, trustworthy...everything that you would seek out in a person, let alone a dog.

Get well, Sadie. Get well.

Monday, June 02, 2008

Two Word Descriptives

My life right now in two word summaries:

Potty Training
Awaiting Summer
Constant Laundry
Settling Fights
Oregon Bound
Baseball's Over
Saving Gas
Falling Behind
Keeping Perspective
Missing Friends
Anticipating Layoffs
Appreciating Kenny
Exhaling Soon
Watching Movies
Trusting God
Friday Prayers
Taking Pictures
Paying Debt
Organizing Home
Seeking Guidance
Celebrating Decisions
Graphics Designing
Backyard Grilling
Michelob Ultra
Convincing Jacksons
Realizing Happiness
Loving Life